e coli mg1655 Search Results


93
Addgene inc ldehyde re duction
Ldehyde Re Duction, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ldehyde re duction/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ldehyde re duction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Addgene inc chromosomal terminus
Chromosomal Terminus, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chromosomal terminus/product/Addgene inc
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chromosomal terminus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Addgene inc midreplichore
Midreplichore, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/midreplichore/product/Addgene inc
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
midreplichore - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Marinus e. coli k-12 mg1655
E. Coli K 12 Mg1655, supplied by Marinus, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e. coli k-12 mg1655/product/Marinus
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e. coli k-12 mg1655 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Meetings e. coli strain mg1655 pnlp8φ10-adh::δpepa::km
E. Coli Strain Mg1655 Pnlp8φ10 Adh/δpepa/Km, supplied by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Meetings, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e. coli strain mg1655 pnlp8φ10-adh::δpepa::km/product/Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Meetings
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e. coli strain mg1655 pnlp8φ10-adh::δpepa::km - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
INCF e. coli mg1655
E. Coli Mg1655, supplied by INCF, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e. coli mg1655/product/INCF
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e. coli mg1655 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
First BASE Laboratories e. coli k12 mg1655 strain
Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the <t>E.</t> <t>coli</t> and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.
E. Coli K12 Mg1655 Strain, supplied by First BASE Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e. coli k12 mg1655 strain/product/First BASE Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e. coli k12 mg1655 strain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
WholeGenome LLC e. coli mg1655 spotted dna arrays
Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the <t>E.</t> <t>coli</t> and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.
E. Coli Mg1655 Spotted Dna Arrays, supplied by WholeGenome LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e. coli mg1655 spotted dna arrays/product/WholeGenome LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e. coli mg1655 spotted dna arrays - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BioResource International Inc strains mg1655 (k-12 f- λ- rph-1)
Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the <t>E.</t> <t>coli</t> and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.
Strains Mg1655 (K 12 F λ Rph 1), supplied by BioResource International Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/strains mg1655 (k-12 f- λ- rph-1)/product/BioResource International Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
strains mg1655 (k-12 f- λ- rph-1) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Miramar Labs e. coli mg1655
Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the <t>E.</t> <t>coli</t> and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.
E. Coli Mg1655, supplied by Miramar Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e. coli mg1655/product/Miramar Labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e. coli mg1655 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
China Center for Type Culture Collection l -threonine-producing strain e. coli mg1655 mutation molecular modification
Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the <t>E.</t> <t>coli</t> and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.
L Threonine Producing Strain E. Coli Mg1655 Mutation Molecular Modification, supplied by China Center for Type Culture Collection, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/l -threonine-producing strain e. coli mg1655 mutation molecular modification/product/China Center for Type Culture Collection
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
l -threonine-producing strain e. coli mg1655 mutation molecular modification - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Detecting a wide range of epitranscriptomic modifications using a nanopore-sequencing-based computational approach with 1D score-clustering

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1168

Figure Lengend Snippet: Average F1-scores of the five algorithms compared in this study on the E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA test dataset ( NC : Nanocompore; DRM : Drummer; E - DSE: Epinano Delta-Sum-Error; E - LR : Epinano Linear Regression). The E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA datasets comprise 10 independent samples. Each sample contains eight subsamples with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000. Different coverage-depths were used since algorithm performance depends on the coverage-depth, as indicated by recent studies ( , ) and also confirmed by our results. Note that all positions are treated as either positive or negative since unsupervised algorithms, do not distinguish between different modification types. In line with this, we do not compute separate F1-scores for each modification type separately, but rather only one F1-score for the whole dataset (for the given coverage-depth). As shown, Modena outperformed other algorithms across all coverage-depths; in some cases by a large margin (e.g. at coverage-depths of 50, 75, 100 and 200). The performance of all algorithms was very stable across the 10 independent samples . Thus, although the figure above shows average F1-scores, the results are highly consistent across all Samples 1–10.

Article Snippet: The E. coli K12 MG1655 strain was grown in 1× LB Broth Miller (1st Base, Singapore) without antibiotics at 37°C at 160 rpm shaking.

Techniques: Modification

Precision–Recall curves (PR curves) for Sample 1 ( E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA dataset) for different coverage-depths. As shown, resampling increases the area under the PR curves (i.e. AUPRC scores) across all coverage-depths. Kuiper test further improves AUPRC scores across all coverage-depths, although to a lesser extent.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Detecting a wide range of epitranscriptomic modifications using a nanopore-sequencing-based computational approach with 1D score-clustering

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1168

Figure Lengend Snippet: Precision–Recall curves (PR curves) for Sample 1 ( E. coli and S. cerevisiae rRNA dataset) for different coverage-depths. As shown, resampling increases the area under the PR curves (i.e. AUPRC scores) across all coverage-depths. Kuiper test further improves AUPRC scores across all coverage-depths, although to a lesser extent.

Article Snippet: The E. coli K12 MG1655 strain was grown in 1× LB Broth Miller (1st Base, Singapore) without antibiotics at 37°C at 160 rpm shaking.

Techniques:

Violin plots of Modena score distributions for positive and negative test cases across different coverage-depths for Sample 1 of the E. coli / S. cerevisiae benchmark dataset are shown. Two well-separated clusters can be seen for all coverage-depths. The final Step 5 of our algorithm (1D score-clustering) leverages this separation to determine the classification threshold. Note that this represents a different paradigm from the standardly used P -value based thresholds. As shown in our study, this approach is not limited to Modena and can, in principle, be applied to any threshold-based unsupervised algorithm.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Detecting a wide range of epitranscriptomic modifications using a nanopore-sequencing-based computational approach with 1D score-clustering

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1168

Figure Lengend Snippet: Violin plots of Modena score distributions for positive and negative test cases across different coverage-depths for Sample 1 of the E. coli / S. cerevisiae benchmark dataset are shown. Two well-separated clusters can be seen for all coverage-depths. The final Step 5 of our algorithm (1D score-clustering) leverages this separation to determine the classification threshold. Note that this represents a different paradigm from the standardly used P -value based thresholds. As shown in our study, this approach is not limited to Modena and can, in principle, be applied to any threshold-based unsupervised algorithm.

Article Snippet: The E. coli K12 MG1655 strain was grown in 1× LB Broth Miller (1st Base, Singapore) without antibiotics at 37°C at 160 rpm shaking.

Techniques:

Average F1-scores (for Samples 1 through 10, E.coli / S. cerevisiae dataset) with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000 are shown. Drummer : original Drummer algorithm with P -value and odds ratio-based threshold; Drummer + 1D clustering : Drummer algorithm (i.e. G-test statistic) with 1D score-clustering step (see Figure ). For detailed results across all samples, see and .

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Detecting a wide range of epitranscriptomic modifications using a nanopore-sequencing-based computational approach with 1D score-clustering

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1168

Figure Lengend Snippet: Average F1-scores (for Samples 1 through 10, E.coli / S. cerevisiae dataset) with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000 are shown. Drummer : original Drummer algorithm with P -value and odds ratio-based threshold; Drummer + 1D clustering : Drummer algorithm (i.e. G-test statistic) with 1D score-clustering step (see Figure ). For detailed results across all samples, see and .

Article Snippet: The E. coli K12 MG1655 strain was grown in 1× LB Broth Miller (1st Base, Singapore) without antibiotics at 37°C at 160 rpm shaking.

Techniques:

Average F1-scores (for Samples 1 through 10, E.coli / S. cerevisiae dataset) with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000 are depicted. Epinano: Epinano-DSE algorithm with z-score based threshold; Epinano + 1D clustering : Epinano-DSE algorithm with 1D score-clustering step (see Figure ). For detailed results across all samples, see and .

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Detecting a wide range of epitranscriptomic modifications using a nanopore-sequencing-based computational approach with 1D score-clustering

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1168

Figure Lengend Snippet: Average F1-scores (for Samples 1 through 10, E.coli / S. cerevisiae dataset) with coverage-depths ranging from 10 to 2000 are depicted. Epinano: Epinano-DSE algorithm with z-score based threshold; Epinano + 1D clustering : Epinano-DSE algorithm with 1D score-clustering step (see Figure ). For detailed results across all samples, see and .

Article Snippet: The E. coli K12 MG1655 strain was grown in 1× LB Broth Miller (1st Base, Singapore) without antibiotics at 37°C at 160 rpm shaking.

Techniques: